Hi all, On 25/02/2008, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or do you think that wxWidgets 2.8 support is actually right around the > corner?
I can give you what I have for wxWidgets 2.8 support (I would merge latest patches and ensure it compiles, but have too many work commitments to do any more), if people feel it's essential and/or useful. There are some rough edges, but it works OK(*) on Windows at least. A thing to bear in mind is that wxWidgets 2.8 support definitively breaks support for the 2.4 line. This may be a deal-breaker for those who like to work in ghci. (*) OK == about as well as wxWidgets 2.6.2 > If not, I'd say that wxhaskell 0.10 should aim for a 'it just works' > installation on the default case (vanilla wxWidgets without any > special flags; for example, what ships with the system) for Windows, > Linux and Mac. I'd especially like for wxhaskell to be easy for > Windows users to install and use. > > The things I'd like to see in wxhaskell 0.11 are > - wxWidgets 2.8 support > - a better way of dealing with contribs/ (see Jeremy's mail on modularity) > - wxc separation (maybe) I actually more or less have wxc separation, in a makefile (I have a single makefile for Microsoft and GNU compilers). It's virtually finished, but not tested on all platforms. Again, happy to provide, but this one isn't for the faint-hearted. Let me know if you'd like the 2.8 support - it is in a slightly rough form, but I've only managed to spend a couple of hours on it in the last 3 months, so may be better to 'get it out there'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
