On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:55:48 -0800 (PST), "Eric Kow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > - I'm not particularly bothered if our implementation of this is ugly. > I figure that 0.11 is going to have wxc separated anyway, so maybe > we'll be able to switch to Simple buildtype for wxcore and all this > will be moot.
I'm not sure. large parts of wxcore are generated by running wxdirect over the wxc headers. I couldn't find a way to make cabal handle this dependency without moving to the Makefile buildtype. I actually got somewhat disillusioned with Cabal while trying to move everything to using it because it really only knows about Haskell dependencies and very simple C/C++ (i.e. which can be compiled via the Haskell compiler). I haven't kept up well with the further development of Cabal recently, but I suspect that the limitation probably remains. The wxc separation should be OK - it's already (as noted previously) essentially working for me. Jeremy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
