Hi Eric Yes I have been essentially following that as a rational approach (though I guess you mean wxWidgets, wxcore, wx ) and I have used all your samples (thanks!). It's good to have a potted example to check out each level.
I realise your readme instructions are skeletal but maybe worth adding that wxWidgets 'minimal' needs the "samples.xpm" file in the src dir (or equiv.). (An alternative wxWidgets version at http://wxwidgets.org/docs/tutorials/hworld.txt does not need this.) On macos another gratifying basic test is applying macosx-app and launching from finder (or open). Regards/ Henry On 27 Jun 2012, at 16:59, Eric Kow wrote: > Out of interest (sorry, not following thread), has the 3-step testing > approach (wxc, wxcore, wx) in my minimal tester been useful at all? > > Thanks, > > Eric > > On 27 Jun 2012, at 16:46, Henry Lockyer wrote: > >> ok + thanks. I guess I'll wait for updated cabal if it is imminent . >> Re (1) I could double-check this in the meantime perhaps, but what to look >> for exactly? >> (I relied on "cabal install wx cabal-macosx" on an empty local user pkg lib >> to get it right.) > > -- > Eric Kow <http://erickow.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
