Ah I see. I'm still looking through the wxHaskell code to see if there is
any work I think I can do (as a beginner!) and thought id give this a
mention.
I agree that SWIG is a great tool! Hopefully they get their summer of code
working.
Many thanks,
Blair
On 14 June 2013 15:02, Jeremy O'Donoghue <jeremy.odonog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From the website...
>
> "To use fficxx, you write a Haskell model of the C++ public interfaces
> and fficxx generates both a C wrapper and associated haskell functions and
> type classes which reflect specified model of the C++ interfaces. It is
> currently the user’s responsibility to specify a correct model of the C++
> interfaces, because fficxx does not presently check for model correctness."
>
> This is the opposite of what you need for wxHaskell - the ideal scenario
> is to parse the C++ headers and use them to generate Haskell bindings
> automatically. Writing correct Haskell representations of the complete
> wxWidgets API will be very painful and is likely to be error-prone (it is
> quite a large API).
>
> There are a few key things that any automated binding generator needs to
> handle:
> * Callback functions - these are used extensively in wxWidgets;
> * Memory management - the approach in wxHaskell today is not completely
> satisfactory and there are quite a few memory leaks.
>
> I believe that the only game in town which is really sufficiently mature
> is SWIG - wxPython bindings are already generated by SWIG, so it is known
> to be fit for purpose. If the Haskell Qt binding generator goes in this
> direction, it may well be what is needed.
>
> Regards
> Jeremy
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 10:27, Eric Kow <eric....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems like something the author would be very interested in testing on.
>> I think the wxHaskell paper talks about how it's done here
>> http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/66810/wxhaskell.pdf
>>
>> On 13 June 2013 20:43, Blair Archibald <mrblairarchib...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > Did anyone see this new C++ foreign function generator mentioned in the
>> > haskell weekly news.
>> >
>> > http://ianwookim.org/fficxx/
>> >
>> > At the moment the lack of documentation puts me off, but something like
>> this
>> > could be the end of some of our generation problems. In my mind it's
>> great
>> > that people are working on this sorta thing!
>> >
>> > I might look into this deeper at the weekend and see if I could use it
>> to
>> > generate wx bindings.
>> >
>> > Many thanks,
>> > Blair
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> >
>> > Build for Windows Store.
>> >
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wxhaskell-devel mailing list
>> > wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> wxhaskell-devel mailing list
>> wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
wxhaskell-devel mailing list
wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
