Hi Eric, On 21/08/07, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > > (*) There's a secondary reason for factoring out the wxc build from > > the wxHaskell build: a number of other languages (most of them in the > > FP church, if you define it reasonably broadly) use wxC as the basis > > for their wxWidgets bindings. > > Are you aware of the wxc project by any chance? > > http://wxc.sourceforge.net/
I'm aware of it, and at least the following others: wxCL (Common Lisp), wxCaml (Ocaml) > We had discussed pooling our resources at some point, but decided the > best thing was to prioritise a wxhaskell release and then talk about > working together. I looked at what has been done on wxC. The main thing they seem to have done is to replace the build system with Ant, which seems like a retrograde step to me (Ant is great in the Java world, but it's just another dependency to everyone else). I understand the build system frustration for them, but wanted to stick with GNU make as it's present (or trivial to install) on pretty much any Free Software development system. ... and yes, we need to prioritize a release. Regards Jeremy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
