John Labenski ha scritto:
1) lua 5.1 does not have an "include" dir so I faked it by copying the
pertinent headers that we use into it.
if you want to keep the header files in lua/src/ folder it's fine for me
as it's not a problem for bakefiles ;)
What about installing? I guess it'd be ok too since lua doesn't use
directories to nicely confine their headers anyway so it's just a
matter of fully specifying the include path.

#include "lua.h" instead of "lua/lua.h"
yes, exactly; changing the way headers are included there should be no
problem at all...
Ok, then lets stick with having an "official" version of lua 5.1.
Would you mind removing the modules/lua/include dir files and
rebaking. I apologize about no doing it myself since I can't get a
compiled version of your bakefile to generate identical build files to
what you've got and until you get a chance I'd like to keep it
working. :)
sure, no problem at all to rebake: it just takes me few seconds ;)


Scrap that, we have this in our wxLua code so we only include
"blah/wxLua/modules"
#include "lua/include/lua.h"

I think we should leave it like this since otherwise it'll be
#include "lua/src/lua.h"

This is what I was getting at about installing, but hadn't really
thought it out clearly. Lets leave everything as is for the time
being.
Ok, so then leave it as it is

Francesco



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wxlua-users mailing list
Wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users

Reply via email to