On 12/20/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > klaas.holwerda ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake?? > > I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-( > > Will it hopefully be the same naming on Unix? > very sorry about that. > > "lua" is now the definitive name (unless others find problems with it) > of the lua interpreter which gets built together with wxLua. > > In this way, if the user does not have Lua installed and he compiles and > installs wxLua, he end up with an "official" (i.e installed in the > standard paths and with standard naming) lua + wxLua. > In fact lua libraries are now called lua5.1 and are installed in > $LIBDIR. Exactly like lua packages would do.
Sounds good to me. John Labenski ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
