On 12/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Labenski ha scritto:
> However mails are ok anyway ;)
Is there anything you'd like me to do? If you don't mind doing it, I
thought all that needs to be done is compiling in VC6 and getting the
inno setup working.
> > but I should be around sunday for a bit.
> ok, let's do sunday morning then. Hopefully it should be a pain-free
> process however.
>
> > I will check these in an hour.
> > VS 2005 dsw using debug lib/dll
> > VC 2003 makefile.vc release lib/dll
> good, yesterday however I tried to build with VC2003 and I've found that
> the LNK4006 problem was not solved... :(
I comes and goes or maybe I'm not paying attention sometimes? It makes
no sense to me and seems harmless, though annoying.
> > I think the C++ code is ok, there's a few things on my todo list, but
> > nothing that should get done before the release.
> good.
>
> BTW I've tried to use a bit the samples with the very latest CVS and
> I've found that some of them may need some small fixes:
I've fixed them, thanks for testing! These are a result of the
tightening up of the allowed parameters to the functions and, yes,
most of these were bugs where the variable passed to a wxLua function
was either a typo or not initialized and had a value of 'nil' which
used to translate to 0 or "". I think it's better this way since It's
very easy to forget [wx.]XXX and if you just get 0 or "" you might not
even know that there's a problem without rigorous testing.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/wxLua/samples$ wxlua debug.wx.lua
> [Debug] 18:07:33: ./wxlua/src/wxlbind.cpp(330): assert
> "!wxlState.GetCallBaseClassFunction()" failed in
> wxLua_lua_getTableFunc(): Base class function call not reset
> Trace/breakpoint trap
>
> (choosing File->Debug)
This sample is BROKEN and I really don't have any idea what it's
supposed to do. It should be completely rewritten to more simply show
some debugging code instead of having all of the extra scribble code
which just confuses things. All it does now is popup a messagebox
telling you that it doesn't do anything. It has some interesting ideas
so I don't want to erase it and start over.
Also... and this is for later, the virtual function code needs to be
tweaked or rewritten. The error you got is a check for recursion, but
this isn't a show stopper since the error is for trying to make a
function for an object in *lua* virtual, which is quite different than
overriding a virtual function in C++ which requires you to really
sublcass it in C++. There's not much point in making virtual lua
functions since nobody but the lua code you write will ever call them.
I need to think more about this though.
Thanks
John Labenski
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
wxlua-users mailing list
wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
