On 12/24/06, Jérôme VUARAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/12/24, John Labenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What you're suggesting is not normal, it's better to have the system's
> > native mainloop control program flow rather than implementing your own
> > which will most likely be far less efficient. In any case you should
> > be able to do it using wxApp::Pending and wxApp::Dispatch.
>
> wxApp::Pending+wxApp::Dispatch seems to be exactly what I need.
>
> I don't know what your definition of normal is, but my question seems
> perfectly normal to me. What I want to achieve is to have several Lua
> frameworks working together in a single thread (because Lua is not
> thread safe). Each of my frameworks need to be updated several times a
> second, but I can't give application main loop control to any of
> these, so I need to make them cooperate.
Sounds good, I was just using "normal" in the sense that having lua
run the mainloop is a little like having the tail wag the dog. It
sounds like you're doing something a little more advanced though, good
luck.
You may still want to consider using wxEVT_IDLE though since I think
that's what is typically suggested on the C++ wxusers mailing list for
doing pseudo-threading like this.
Regards,
John Labenski
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
wxlua-users mailing list
wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
