On 1/31/07, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well, it won't be difficult to add it but I wonder how much it is useful... do > you do that to create an app with fewer dynamic dependencies?
Yes. This is always a debate, but Microsoft has ruined how easy it used to be to distribute the run-time in VC8.0 with there manifest tool. I hate it and I won't do it. My thought is if it is easy to implement then give the users the choice, right? Why would you have a static library and not make it completely dependency free? It just doesn't seem intuitive to me. If I want .dll's then of coarse I wouldn't mind the run-time dll, but otherwise I just like to make things simpler. > Also, just out of curiosity, how much the size of the final EXE increases > using > RUNTIME_LIBS==static? I haven't got a definite answer for that. I don't think by very much. plus the size of the exe doesn't matter too much because generally using a large library like wxWidgets it make the executable larger anyways. You give up size for convenience. ;-) -- Regards, Ryan RJP Computing ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
