On 6/12/07, Alec Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > John Labenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > ... > > > >2) To avoid any potential function name conflicts since C/C++ cannot > >have functions start with '_', > Library functions might. No issues w/ this?
I don't know what you mean? The binding __index metatable function for a userdata class checks for a leading '_' on a function call, flags that the user wants the baseclass function, removes the '_' and then checks the binding class struct for a C++ function with that name. So... it's really only checking C++ functions which can never start with a '_' anyway. The lua code has the ability to name functions it attaches to user data to anything, so forcing people to not start them with a '_' is not too much to ask I think. The C++ side, on the other hand, is inflexible unless we want to get back into having renamed functions. Take a look at the bottom of unittest.wx.lua for some examples of it. Specificly, "Test adding a methods..." and "Test virtual class functions...". http://wxlua.cvs.sourceforge.net/wxlua/wxLua/samples/unittest.wx.lua?view=markup I think this is pretty simple and clean, do you agree? Regards, John Labenski ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
