Hi, John Labenski wrote: > [snip] > Anyway... The name of this function, "Delete()", is *very* generic and > will probably conflict with some class function eventually and I'm > surprised it hasn't already. >
o = wx.wxXXX(...) o:Destroy() is better due to wx naming? - If XXX class has a cpp Destroy method, it is already doing what we want - If not then we supply this method for Lua > What if we rename it to "delete()", lower case, since that is a NOT a > valid name for a class member function (I just tried it) and so there > cannot be a conflict with anything that ever gets bound by wxLua. > > This will also match the "new(...)" function that you can now use for > class constructors. > Is it possible to have both? new - delete ... - Destroy > Regards, > John Labenski > -- Regards, Hakki Dogusan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
