Hi, RPMs - I would support the edition of Fedora that is compatible with the current RHEL release. Here in Europe, SuSE is, I would say, the more popular of the two. But take US into account and it still has to be Fedora.
But it might also work out well if, as well as the official binaries, you added a 'contrib-unofficial' section to the sourceforge download page. If you publish the build options you used for each official binary, I think you might get some support with unofficial binaries for, say, SuSE, OSX 10.3 PPC etc - that could go in the contrib downloads section. Whatever you decide for the final list, same version binaries for Win32, OSX and Ubuntu would make me a very happy fellow indeed. Regards Mark Mattia Barbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I'm almost ready to start doing binary builds again. > > I plan to provide: > - ActivePerl/Win32/ANSI&Unicode, > - OS X 10.4 Universal binary/Unicode > - Debian packages (hopefully for both Debian and Ubuntu) > - Some kind of RPM > > The question is: which RPM distribution should > I try to support? Fedore? SuSe? Other? > > Regards, > Mattia > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Scegli infostrada: ADSL gratis per tutta l’estate e telefoni senza canone > Telecom > http://click.libero.it/infostrada >
