Thank you Octavian, it nice to hear the wx is richer! As my problem is concerned, I have not found the solution yet but I did some progress.
Am I correct that I saw you on win32::GUI user list? Have you jump here because of richness of the wxperl to compare to win32GUI or because of multi OS of wx libraries? Waldemar Sunday 27 of April 2008 22:10:45 Octavian Rasnita napisał(a): > From: "Johan Vromans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Waldemar Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> I would expect that wxwidgets is richer than Win32::GUI ... > > > > Why? Wx is an abstraction layer on top of several implementations. It > > cannot do more than the implementation supports (unless it can emulate > > it). Wx's strenght is that it gives the application the look and feel > > of the underlying --native-- implementation instead of something > > differently. > > Win32::GUI is not the underlying implementation of WxPerl. It is just > another perl module which is based on Win32 API, just like WxPerl for > Windows is. > > And yes, WxPerl is richer than Win32::GUI because it offers more controls, > even if some of them are based on "external" tools, like Wx::Help (that can > create chm widgets). > Wx::ActiveX is also much better developed than Win32::GUI::AxWindow, WxPerl > has more layout managers than Win32::GUI, WxPerl handles UTF-8 while > Win32::GUI doesn't and there may be many other advantages of WxPerl. > > Octavian > >
