Mattia Barbon <mattia.bar...@libero.it> writes: > On the one hand it would be nice if "use Wx" wouldn't require a > display. On the other hand, creating a Wx::App will always require a > display, and I'm not sure which wxWidgets classes can be used > without a Wx::App instance.
I'm reasonably successful in running Wx apps without DISPLAY. At least, apart from the message "Unable to initialize gtk, is DISPLAY set properly?" nothing seems to blow up. I provide stubs for widgets that really display things, but the general Wx::App stuff (like Wx::ConfigBase) works okay. Why I'm doing this? I have a big Wx app that has some dialogs that do heavy work and now I can run this exact dialog code to do the work automatically from cron jobs. -- Johan
