Hi, maybe it is a problem: http://padre.perlide.org/trac/ticket/941 My guess is that this ticket has been reported by Johan ...
Best, Z. On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Mark Dootson <mark.doot...@znix.com> wrote: > Hi, > > IF Padre has a problem with 0.95 / 0.96 on linux - you'd need to check that > first - I'm just making a guess. But perhaps there isn't a problem. Come to > think of it, if Johan can view the wxDemo example code displayed correctly > in an STC window, then there probably isn't an issue with STC. I recall > there are these sorts of problems with more than html - I just can't recall > which components specifically. > > If there were an issue, then it seems to me the simplest thing would be to > make 0.97 a requirement > > cpan Padre > > should then do the right thing. > > > On 04/05/2010 15:56, Zeno Gantner wrote: >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Mark Dootson<mark.doot...@znix.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Wx 0.96 passes all tests - so not fault of Ubuntu folks. >>> The change was introduced in version 0.95, as I recall, in response to a >>> user issue with PAR::Packer. >>> I'm not sure if one could write a test that would tell you if >>> Wx::HtmlWindow >>> is rendering as expected. >>> >>> A pity that this ended up in Ubuntu LTS 10.4. It will probably trip up >>> the >>> Padre folks too as they use STC. >> >> Would you recommend that Padre should try to avoid 0.95 and 0.96, and >> maybe issue a warning (either at runtime, or when running perl >> Makefile.PL) >> if one of those versions of Wx is installed? >> >> Best regards, >> Zeno > >
