Hi Johan,

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl> wrote:
>>  A year ago I wanted to experiment with wx and I first went to wxPerl.
>> But the website gave me the impression that the project was largely
>> unmaintained (e.g. most recent docs were many years old).
>
> wxPerl is alive and kicking, under full development and maintenance.
> Okay, I agree the web site is a bit outdated...
> ...
> As you found out, it is rather trivial to use the official wxWidgets
> docs for wxPerl.

I understand. It is impractical, and slightly pointless, to make a
full API reference for wxPerl. In my opinion, what wxPerl really needs
is:

1) Explain that you are supposed to read the C++ docs => DONE. Website
does this already.

2) Give some guidance to how to do that => TODO. This is missing.

3) Give a short guide to get you started => INCOMPLETE.  Mattia's
tutorial is exactly what we need here, but it was never finished.
Chapter 5 says "to be continued" and it was last updated in 2004.


The good new here though is that wxPerl doesn't need that much more:

(1) Write a half-page "guide to reading the Wx reference for wxPerl users".

(2) Expand Mattia's tutorial with a few more chapters. Chapter 5 could
introduce a couple more widgets (so far only buttons are introduced)
and Chapter 6 can use sizers to make a basic layout. That would a
reasonable introduction to wxPerl.

Daniel.
-- 
Intolerant people should be shot.

Reply via email to