Steve: I need to read-up on find before I can make an intelligent comment. And also need to look at the rm_wx.sh script in detail.
I'll add add a reference to "http://sourceforge.net/p/wxperl/code/HEAD/tree/" to the notes for checking on the current version of things. I did see the 3.0.2 reference to your github repo. I like moving to ~/Perl/wxPerl and ~/Perl/wxPerlAlien-wxWidgets as opposed to creating home level directories. Will make that change. The rm script should go there too. I like readability over execution on the apt-gets. This whole process is quick enough for me. James On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Steve Cookson - gmail < steveco.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for putting it out there. And great response. > > My comments follow. > > Steve. > > On 20-10-2014 18:20, James Lynes wrote: > > > > I got the following feedback from posting the install script on Perl > Monks. > > Any thoughts? Willing to keep it updated as needed. > > I see 3.0.2 is available. Is it in the svn repository? > > At the time of writing it is not there. Look here to check: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/wxperl/code/HEAD/tree/ > > If you look at my earlier emails, you can find a script which points to my > own github repo with 3.0.2 in it. > > > James > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I think that a couple of improvements can be made there. > > First of all, > > find /usr | grep -i wx | grep -v -i python | grep -v -i soffice > rm_w+x.sh > # | Collect wx files. Exclude wxpython, and soffice files > sed -i -e 's/\/usr\//rm -rf \/usr\//g' rm_wx.sh > [download] > <http://perlmonks.org/?abspart=1;displaytype=displaycode;node_id=1104254;part=1> > > This looks scary and will break the packages installed in the system. For > example, wxmaxima, a frontend to a symbolic calculation system written in > LISP, will be deleted (but the package will be still marked installed). > MCabber, a jabber client not related to Perl or Wx in any way, is going to > get damaged, too. > > It's true, it is dangerous. When I'm running and re-running it, it is > more important to me that I don't have to do a total rebuild each time, but > we should try to refine this part of the script to make it safer for > users. If your Perl Monk has any ideas we could incorporate them. > > Manual cleanups should be done only in /usr/local; > > I don't know about this, if that is true we could make it: > > find /usr/local > > instead. > > other parts of /usr belong to dpkg. Perhaps feeding the output of the > command to dpkg -S and removing the packages it finds is a better idea, > but you still need a way to filter the package names which should not be > deleted (perhaps removing only packages with names matching 'lib*' will > help for a start?). > > Also, you can save on the child processes by using find expressions > instead of grep: find /usr -iwholename '*wx*' \! \( -iwholename > '*python*' -o -iwholename '*soffice' \) should produce the same output > (and you can also use -iname instead of -iwholename to filter file names > only). > > It takes a few seconds out of 45 minutes, I don't think it is significant. > > Another two relatively unimportant things are that you ask the users to > create a Perl directory in their ~, but don't use it much and download > wxPerl and Alien-wxWidgets in the ~ instead > > You can update the wxPerl and Alien-wxWidgets directories to ~/Perl/wxPerl > and ~/Perl/wxPerlAlien-wxWidgets if you think is neater. > > and that you can save a lot of time on apt-get startup if you merge all > apt-get install commands into one. > > I agree. It's a trade-off between readability and execution. Your format > is more readable, but the merged format is easier to manipulate. Again, I'm > not sure that the total execution time is much faster. I don't mind which > course we take. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > My response: > > aitap: > > Thank you for your reply. I'll get back to the original author and see if > we can improve the find section. The rm_wx.sh script is saved, so I will > take a look and see what was deleted unintentionally. The cleanup commands > would not be needed for a new install. For me, it was visually easier to > keep the apt-get commands separate as I was merging several scripts and > cross checking between them to make sure I didn't miss anything. The Perl > directory is where I put the install script and other install files. The > user is free to customize to their installation. > > James > > >