Shet, Aniruddha G. wrote on 04/03/2007 09:25:03 PM:
> Hi,
>
> My understanding is that array assignment and update/overlay operations
> are not designed to operate on arrays that do not having matching
> distributions, even though they may have matching regions?
>
> I am seeing that an activity that tries to update a local reference type
> array with a subdistribution of a global array that is final value type
> fails with BadPlaceException. The local array and the subdistribution
> have identical regions. The locality rule is not being violated here. Is
> the mismatch of distributions the reason for failure?
Hi, Aniruddha,
This behavior sounds like a bug. The way you described it, it certainly
does not correspond to the X10 language definition.
It would help greatly in debugging this problem if you could reduce it to
a simple (and preferably short) test case. Feel free to post it to the
list or enter it in Bugzilla. It would also help if you could show the
full stack trace of the BadPlaceException you're getting.
Igor
--
Igor Peshansky (note the spelling change!)
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
XJ: No More Pain for XML's Gain (http://www.research.ibm.com/xj/)
X10: Parallel Productivity and Performance (http://x10.sf.net/)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
