Chris Bunch <c...@cs.ucsb.edu> wrote on 02/01/2011 12:57:10 PM:
>
> Hi David,
> Is the svn head currently stable enough for us to use for running
> performance numbers for writing papers with? I'm mainly concerned with
> automating my X10 install as we distribute it out across virtual
> machines, so that was how I came across this problem in the first place.
> Similarly, if a 2.1.2 release is not too far out, would it be reasonable
> to assume that it wouldn't have this problem?
>
Hi,
We're expecting to create the 2.1.2 release branch this week (should
be within 24-48 hours). The actual release is probably 2 weeks or so away,
but the branch would give you fairly stable point to use if you don't want
to wait for the actual formal release. The svn head/2.1.2 branch/2.1.2
release are not dependent on SF cvs to get BDWGC.
The svn head as of last night looks fairly stable (especially on
linux), so it should be usable. But if you can wait a day or so that would
have the advantage of giving you the actual branch to use as a reference
point.
--dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
