Richard Gomes <rgomes1...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote on 02/26/2011 02:10:59 PM:
> I've added a not to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XTENLANG-731 Richard, apply() is replaced by operator this(). So now the name "apply" carries no special meaning. If you were relying on the operator-like behavior of the apply() method in your code, you should change it to the operator. The expected upgrade pattern is: "def apply() { B }" becomes "def apply() { B } final operator this() { apply() }" (this will also retain the previous behavior when overriding apply() in subclasses). This can be optimized if you know that apply() is never invoked explicitly. Hope this helps, Igor -- Igor Peshansky (note the spelling change!) IBM T.J. Watson Research Center X10: Parallel Productivity and Performance (http://x10-lang.org/) XJ: No More Pain for XML's Gain (http://www.research.ibm.com/xj/) "I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand" -- Xun Zi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ X10-users mailing list X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
