Sascha Roloff <sascha.rol...@googlemail.com> wrote on 03/24/2011 09:46:00 PM:
> > Hi David, > > I checked this example code with the latest svn version and it doesn't work > in the case of copying the data back from a remote array to a local array. > > I compiled the x10 version with following command: > ant dist -Doptimize=true -DNO_CHECKS=true > > And I compiled the sourcecode with this command: > x10c++ -O -NO_CHECKS -x10rt standalone -o test Test.x10 > > The output is: > Expected to find 1 at [1] but found 0 > Expected to find 2 at [2] but found 0 > Expected to find 3 at [3] but found 0 > Expected to find 4 at [4] but found 0 > Expected to find 5 at [5] but found 0 > Expected to find 6 at [6] but found 0 > Expected to find 7 at [7] but found 0 > Expected to find 8 at [8] but found 0 > Expected to find 9 at [9] but found 0 > Expected to find 10 at [10] but found 0 > > > I don't know what I am doing wrong. > I'll take a look. On our nightly test it is passing. But we are running using the sockets backend with 2 places and with checking enabled (vs. standalone with 1 place and NO_CHECKS). --dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ X10-users mailing list X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
