Hi all,
This is in reference to the Fibonacci example available at
http://dist.codehaus.org/x10/applications/samples/Fib.x10
Although async at != at async always, but shouldn't the following two
versions of async produce similar effect?
at (here) async { f1 = fib(n-1); } must start a new activity located
here and executing S
async at (here) {fi = fib(n-1); } must also start a new activity here
and execute S here as well.
Aren't both the same and should compile correctly when the program compiles
correctly with async { f1 = fib(n-1)} ? However, the compiler reports this
error : "f1" may not have been initialized
Thanks,
Jeeva P.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
