Yes I agree, that in the workaround I posted, setting the flag is still be
dependent on the single lock.
I wonder if there's some documentation to x10.util.concurrent package?
Thank you,
Saliya
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Vijay Saraswat <vi...@saraswat.org> wrote:
> On 11/16/12 3:58 PM, LEONID ILYEVSKY wrote:
>
> Saliya suggested to use boolean flag to guard the critical session, set it
> in the "when" block and unset it in "atomic". Looks like a solution
> virtually equivalent to java's synchronization. What do you think?
>
>
> This wont give the performance you want because of the current
> single-lock-per-place implementation (see Dave Cunningham's message).
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
> _______________________________________________
> X10-users mailing list
> X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
>
>
--
Saliya Ekanayake
http://www.esaliya.blogspot.com
http://www.esaliya.wordpress.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
