Hello again,
I tried to restructure my code according to the example..
The problem is that I get errors with the SumReducer struct (the errors
point to the java generated code, and can't really make sense)
I checked the specification for v2.3. and found this:
offers. The offers concept was experimental in 2.1, but was determined
inadequate. It has not been removed from the compiler yet, but it will be
soon. In
the meantime, traces of it are still visible in the grammar. They should
not be
used and can safely be ignored
Also I cannot track the Reducible interface in the API.
Is there any other more explicit way to reduce values from different places?
Thanks again,
Konstantina
2013/6/27 Konstantina Panagiotopoulou <kwno...@hotmail.com>
> Hello again,
>
> I tried to restructure my code according to the example..
> The problem is that I get errors with the SumReducer struct (the errors
> point to the java generated code, and can't really make sense)
> I checked the specification for v2.3. and found this:
>
> offers. The offers concept was experimental in 2.1, but was determined
> inadequate. It has not been removed from the compiler yet, but it will be
> soon. In
> the meantime, traces of it are still visible in the grammar. They should
> not be
> used and can safely be ignored
>
> Also I cannot track the Reducible interface in the API.
>
> Is there any other more explicit way to reduce values from different
> places?
>
> Thanks again,
> Konstantina
>
>
> 2013/6/22 Vijay Saraswat <vi...@saraswat.org>
>
>> On 6/21/13 9:21 PM, Konstantina Panagiotopoulou wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the useful feedback.
>>> Although, I did not expect I would need such low level tuning. Looks a
>>> lot like MPI.
>>>
>>> X10 is a procedural programming language for distributed programming
>> where the notions of concurrency and distribution are made explicit.
>>
>> It is closer to MPI than, say, a more limited, declarative language with
>> implicit concurrency, in which the compiler determines run-time concurrency
>> and distribution (e.g. ZPL).
>>
>> We are very interested in such (declarative) languages as well, and
>> building them on top of X10, in the long term.
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
