Hi again,
Thank you for your quick feedback. I did test the same code again with 2.5.1
and submitted a bug report. In fact, I had a question about a more complicated
case before I encountered the bug earlier.
With the following code:
import x10.io.Console;
class Test1 {
public static def main(Rail[String]) {
var x: Long = -1;
clocked finish {
clocked async {
clocked finish {
Clock.advanceAll();
Clock.advanceAll();
x= 1;
}
}
clocked async {
clocked finish {
Clock.advanceAll();
Clock.advanceAll();
Clock.advanceAll();
x= 0;
}
}
Clock.advanceAll();
x = 3;
}
Console.OUT.println("x="+x);
}
}
I get the following output:
$x10c++ Test1.x10 -o Test1; ./Test1
x=0
However, I expect x=3 as output.
The manual mentions that the inner clocked finish operates within a single
phase of the outer one. Therefore the last advance should halt the primary
activity until activities for both clocked asyncs terminate, since all other
calls to Clock.advanceAll is inside another clocked finish.
Is my interpretation correct?
Thanks,
Tomofumi Yuki
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
