On Saturday October 22 2016 12:00:37 [email protected] wrote:
> A flat_namespace version of libXt is available in > /opt/X11/lib/flat_namespace to help ease the transition (#96292) Set > DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/X11/lib/flat_namespace when executing older > non-compliant software (eg: Motif-based applications) Does this mean that anything linking to libXt.6 has to be rebuilt? If I'm not mistaken it would have been possible to install the libXt.6 2-level runtime library with a slightly different name, point the link library libXt.dylib to that new version, and maintain the flat libXt.6.dylib with its old name so that preexisting binaries continue(d) to work. If correct, why has that approach not been taken? R. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. X11-users mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
