On 12 Sep, Steve Borho wrote : > Reimplementations of STL and Related Identity Crises > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > Why are you reimplementing STL classes like std::list? I could understand > > if it was in C, > > so as to aid in the promised future port to C, but it's being done in C++, > > using new and > > delete, etc. This makes no sense. There's no reason to do this other than > > some misguided > > Not In House syndrome or obsession with the resulting binary size. So, uh, > > what? > > > > STL implementations between different compilers (even between different > compiler versions) cause serious headaches because it is half-header and > half-lib. Since a lot of users will use x265 as a static library, it > behooves us to avoid this pain.
Sorry, but which one is actually broken? Moreover, if the basic is broken in the compiler, use a 3rd party library to do the reimplementation (see projects like winpthread), why bloat the codebase with stuff like that? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device _______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
