Sorry for the radio-silence. That is the right forum, yes - though you can contact us on this mailing list as well.
On that thread, all generic quality issues have been clumped together. And as you can imagine, there isnt a straight-off answer or fix for any of these. I have a response to the specific test case you mentioned there. Thanks, Deepthi On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Webterminate Catchall < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > What's the relevance of the bug tracker apparently run by Multicoreware > on bitbucket.org? (https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues) ... > Is this the central, authoritative bug tracker? Or should I report bugs > for x265 somewhere else? A while ago I filed this: > > https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/214/ghosting-artefacts-even-with-low-crf-when > ... but it got so little response that I'm wondering whether I've been > reporting it to some fork or peripheral place that's not relevant for > the actual development of x265. > > Cheers, > :: Florian > > _______________________________________________ > x265-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel > -- Deepthi Nandakumar Engineering Manager, x265 Multicoreware, Inc
_______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
