Thank you point out my fault, I forgot to check default value field, I was fixed this bug now.
At 2016-09-13 15:12:33,"Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer" <[email protected]> wrote: >Am 07.09.2016, 22:27 Uhr, schrieb Min Chen <[email protected]>: > >> + H0(" --[no-]slices <integer> Enable Multiple Slices >> feature. Default %s\n", OPT(param->maxSlices)); > >The result is: > > --[no-]slices <integer> Enable Multiple Slices feature. Default >enabled > >Apparently, OPT(param->maxSlices) is preferably interpreted as boolean, >despite requesting an integer number as parameter when enabled. I would >guess the default number is 1? > >Should there be a less ambiguous format to represent a "default value, if >not disabled", or do I think too "German" here? ;-) > >-- > >Fun and success! >Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer >mailto:[email protected] > >_______________________________________________ >x265-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
_______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
