Kalyan, Once encoder params are reconfigured, isn't it required to check that the reconfiguration doesn't violate encoder's configuration specified in encoder->configure(). I am assuming that encoder's configure() settings have higher priority over the reconfiguration settings.
Thanks, Aruna On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 12:02 PM Kalyan Goswami <kal...@multicorewareinc.com> wrote: > If it is not a reconfigureParam - then why we need to configure it? > > Thanks, > Kalyan Goswami, PhD > Video Architect @ MulticoreWare > http: <http://www.multicorewareinc.com/>//www.multicorewareinc.com > <http://www.multicorewareinc.com/> > +91 9884989331 > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 5:32 PM Aruna Matheswaran < > ar...@multicorewareinc.com> wrote: > >> # HG changeset patch >> # User Aruna Matheswaran <ar...@multicorewareinc.com> >> # Date 1545907588 -19800 >> # Thu Dec 27 16:16:28 2018 +0530 >> # Node ID b5fc28ec5addfd2d35622ad838c91fba04247477 >> # Parent b14834a9d1c1864ea7e94d9cfed4e33f37e767c6 >> Validate reconfigured params using encoder's configure >> >> diff -r b14834a9d1c1 -r b5fc28ec5add source/encoder/api.cpp >> --- a/source/encoder/api.cpp Mon Dec 17 12:15:47 2018 +0530 >> +++ b/source/encoder/api.cpp Thu Dec 27 16:16:28 2018 +0530 >> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ >> } >> else >> { >> + encoder->configure(encoder->m_latestParam); >> if (encoder->m_latestParam->scalingLists && >> encoder->m_latestParam->scalingLists != encoder->m_param->scalingLists) >> { >> if (encoder->m_param->bRepeatHeaders) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> x265-devel mailing list >> x265-devel@videolan.org >> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > x265-devel mailing list > x265-devel@videolan.org > https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel >
_______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel