Am 24.05.23 um 10:04 schrieb Sam:

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:55 PM Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer <cont...@ligh.de> wrote:

    Yes, it looks a lot more tidy. Just a few warnings left.


    chen schrieb am 24.05.2023 um 06:13:
    > Hello,
    >
    > Could you please try my local patch?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Min Chen
    >
    > 2023-05-21 17:27:35,"Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer" <cont...@ligh.de>
    >>Almost 3 years later, NASM version 2.16.01, and still no solution,
    >>nobody is responsible for "just" warnings.
    >>
    >>--
    >>
    >>Fun and success!
    >>
    >>Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer
    >>maito:cont...@ligh.de <mailto:maito%3acont...@ligh.de>
    >>
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > x265-devel mailing list
    > x265-devel@videolan.org
    > https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
    >


If you take a look at Patman's x265 mod, there are a couple of fixes that seem to get rid of the warnings.

https://github.com/Patman86/x265-Mod-by-Patman/commit/1ecd3d79ac5f3f2883650ca8f9b4c18c8f2b864c


This one is similar to the one I submitted 3 years ago and to the fix that is 
applied for x264.
https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/2020-July/013062.html




Sami

_______________________________________________
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel

_______________________________________________
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel

Reply via email to