Here's the new patch. lumaSamples and maxLumaSamples are now changed back to uint32. Since the range is now smaller (relatively to uint64), I think allowing override in resolution check with --allow-non-conformance is not safe, so I removed it. And since the override is removed, the limit is changed to Level 7.2 value to make new levels actually available. The calculation in the resolution check is kept at uint64, so that the results exceeding uint32 range can be correctly refused.
Original From: chen chenm...@163.com Sent Time: 2025-02-4- 23:06 To: Richard ccc7...@foxmail.com Cc: Development for x265 x265-devel@videolan.org Subject: Re:Re:Re: [x265] [PATCH] Add new Levels Thanks, it is my fault, I look into incorrect table. Now, the only comment is, - uint32_t lumaSamples = param.sourceWidth * param.sourceHeight; - uint32_t samplesPerSec = (uint32_t)(lumaSamples * ((double)param.fpsNum / param.fpsDenom)); + uint64_t lumaSamples = param.sourceWidth * param.sourceHeight; 1) unnecessary 64 bits for resolution 2) I double checked output assembly, the statement is (32b * 32b) -> 32b -> 64b, so result is 32 bits. + uint64_t samplesPerSec = (uint64_t)(lumaSamples * ((double)param.fpsNum / param.fpsDenom)); we can convert lumaSamples to 64bits here. Regards, Chen At 2025-02-04 20:37:58, "Richard" <ccc7...@foxmail.com> wrote: Which should be correct. This is MaxCPB size, MaxBR is in Table A.9. Original From: chen chenm...@163.com Sent Time: 2025-02-4- 12:10 To: Development for x265 x265-devel@videolan.org , ccc7922 ccc7...@foxmail.com Subject: Re:Re: [x265] [PATCH] Add new Levels This? At 2025-02-04 02:07:58, "Richard" <ccc7...@foxmail.com> wrote: I think I read the spec (PDF version) correct, but exactly which 240000? The reason of using uint64 for lumaSamples is that I also changed the resolution check so it can be bypassed by --allow-non-conformance, and the value can potentially exceed uint32. Original From: chen chenm...@163.com Sent Time: 2025-02-3- 23:47 To: Development for x265 x265-devel@videolan.org , ccc7922 ccc7...@foxmail.com Subject: Re:[x265] [PATCH] Add new Levels Thank for the patch, I have some comments From 249a2dd99de9edfd16867430deb0670f35e74941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mr-Z-2697 <74594146+mr-z-2...@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:35:38 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add new Levels LevelSpec levels[] = { - { 36864, 552960, 128, MAX_UINT, 350, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL1, "1", 10 }, - { 122880, 3686400, 1500, MAX_UINT, 1500, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL2, "2", 20 }, - { 245760, 7372800, 3000, MAX_UINT, 3000, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL2_1, "2.1", 21 }, - { 552960, 16588800, 6000, MAX_UINT, 6000, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL3, "3", 30 }, - { 983040, 33177600, 10000, MAX_UINT, 10000, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL3_1, "3.1", 31 }, - { 2228224, 66846720, 12000, 30000, 12000, 30000, 4, Level::LEVEL4, "4", 40 }, - { 2228224, 133693440, 20000, 50000, 20000, 50000, 4, Level::LEVEL4_1, "4.1", 41 }, - { 8912896, 267386880, 25000, 100000, 25000, 100000, 6, Level::LEVEL5, "5", 50 }, - { 8912896, 534773760, 40000, 160000, 40000, 160000, 8, Level::LEVEL5_1, "5.1", 51 }, - { 8912896, 1069547520, 60000, 240000, 60000, 240000, 8, Level::LEVEL5_2, "5.2", 52 }, - { 35651584, 1069547520, 60000, 240000, 60000, 240000, 8, Level::LEVEL6, "6", 60 }, - { 35651584, 2139095040, 120000, 480000, 120000, 480000, 8, Level::LEVEL6_1, "6.1", 61 }, - { 35651584, 4278190080U, 240000, 800000, 240000, 800000, 6, Level::LEVEL6_2, "6.2", 62 }, - { MAX_UINT, MAX_UINT, MAX_UINT, MAX_UINT, MAX_UINT, MAX_UINT, 1, Level::LEVEL8_5, "8.5", 85 }, + { 36864, 552960, 128, MAX_UINT, 350, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL1, "1", 10 }, + { 122880, 3686400, 1500, MAX_UINT, 1500, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL2, "2", 20 }, + { 245760, 7372800, 3000, MAX_UINT, 3000, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL2_1, "2.1", 21 }, + { 552960, 16588800, 6000, MAX_UINT, 6000, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL3, "3", 30 }, + { 983040, 33177600, 10000, MAX_UINT, 10000, MAX_UINT, 2, Level::LEVEL3_1, "3.1", 31 }, + { 2228224, 66846720, 12000, 30000, 12000, 30000, 4, Level::LEVEL4, "4", 40 }, + { 2228224, 133693440, 20000, 50000, 20000, 50000, 4, Level::LEVEL4_1, "4.1", 41 }, + { 8912896, 267386880, 25000, 100000, 25000, 100000, 6, Level::LEVEL5, "5", 50 }, + { 8912896, 534773760, 40000, 160000, 40000, 160000, 8, Level::LEVEL5_1, "5.1", 51 }, + { 8912896, 1069547520, 60000, 240000, 60000, 240000, 8, Level::LEVEL5_2, "5.2", 52 }, + { 35651584, 1069547520, 60000, 240000, 60000, 240000, 8, Level::LEVEL6, "6", 60 }, + { 35651584, 2139095040, 120000, 480000, 120000, 480000, 8, Level::LEVEL6_1, "6.1", 61 }, + { 35651584, 4278190080U, 240000, 800000, 240000, 800000, 6, Level::LEVEL6_2, "6.2", 62 }, + { 80216064, 4812963840ULL, 320000, 1600000, 240000, 1600000, 6, Level::LEVEL6_3, "6.3", 63 }, + { 142606336, 4812963840ULL, 320000, 1600000, 240000, 1600000, 6, Level::LEVEL7, "7", 70 }, mismatch to HEVC spec, 240000? static inline int _confirm(x265_param* param, bool bflag, const char* message) @@ -152,8 +156,8 @@ void determineLevel(const x265_param &param, VPS& vps) vps.ptl.profileCompatibilityFlag[Profile::MAINSCC] = true; #endif - uint32_t lumaSamples = param.sourceWidth * param.sourceHeight; - uint32_t samplesPerSec = (uint32_t)(lumaSamples * ((double)param.fpsNum / param.fpsDenom)); + uint64_t lumaSamples = param.sourceWidth * param.sourceHeight; Maximum picture size is 142,606,336, it is in 32-bits range
2E363300@44A2AF16.ED73A26700000000.png
Description: Binary data
0001-Add-new-Levels.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel