Michael Hierweck schreef: > Hi everybody, > > we have been trying x2go for about a year now both on our thin clients > and as a remote access solution. > > On our thin clients (both legacy Intel Pentium-III 1 GHz and modern > Intel Atom 330) it appears a lot of CPU power is consumed by ssh. > Especially while both animations and sounds are played the play back is > sometimes interrupted due to the lack of CPU performance. > > So we temporarily switched back to plain remote X11 (without compression > and encryption) for our thin clients while sticking to x2go for remote > access. > > Nevertheless x2go seem to be designed for both purposes. > > I would like to ask if someone else can confirm this and if the is a > workaround. Maybe it will be possible to skip encryption for local use > in a future version in order to be able save CPU time and even energy. > (Of course x2go uses ssh for both security and port forwarding.) > > There shouldn't be a complaint but a starting point to discuss this topic.
I am using NX-based solutions for many years (most of them are still FreeNX), and I have also seen problems with animations (most of the time websites with flash). In my opinion it are no problems on the client, but problems on the server. I am not sure, but I think there are limits on resources per-user in NX. I expect that when you try a fast client, you will have the same problems. Try a website with a big format flash film. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- http://www.vandervlis.nl/ _______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
