On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:02:00 (CET), Erik Auerswald wrote: > The problem with NoMachine going closed source is that the people > updating, improving and fixing (the free) NX will stop doing so (or > have already done that). NX is the enabler for X2Go, but I don't see > X2Go having the manpower to tackle the additional task of developing > resp. maintaining NX themselves.
I feel the same. Having said this, I notice that there seem to be other projects that also rely on the NX libraries, TTBOMK: freenx, opennx and neatx. It might make sense to discuss the future of the 'free' NX technology with all interested parties. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
