Am 23.02.2011 06:28, schrieb Gerry Reno: > On 02/22/2011 11:59 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 23:23 -0500, Gerry Reno wrote: >> >>> On 02/22/2011 10:16 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 21:09 -0500, Gerry Reno wrote: >>>> >>>> <big snip> >>>> >>>>> And rather than trying to pass the actual content around it's just seems >>>>> easier to post the content on a webserver that the users can access from >>>>> their client machines. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> This is where I disagree. When we have control of the content and >>>> environment that works. But that's not our environment. We want as >>>> seamless a user experience as possible whether they are browsing the >>>> Internet and hit a video, clicking on an email attachment that happens >>>> to be video, or viewing some kind of embedded video content. We expect >>>> our clients to be able to work as closely as possible to their physical >>>> environment in their virtual environment. The onus is on us to make >>>> that possible as transparently as possible without changing their >>>> procedures. That may not be true of all deployments but it is true of >>>> ours - John >>>> >>>> >>> Right now there is no simple way to do this with x2go or any of the >>> other remote access technologies. >>> >> Actually, although I have not used it, I believe Citrix is doing >> something like this. Whatever EyeOS is doing works very well. HP is >> taking a different approach by adapting their transport to the nature of >> the video being transmitted. If what I propose is feasible, we have a >> possible solution. >> >>> For true transparency the media would have to be played on the remote >>> desktop media player but then the performance is bad. >>> >>> To get satisfactory performance you have to use the media players on the >>> users machine but then you would not have seamless experience. >>> >> It is not entirely seamless but, at least for our purposes, it is much >> better than saying, "save the video to disk, transfer the file to your >> local computer, now open it using your local media player." Let's do all >> of that automatically for them. That may not work well for your >> environment but it would for ours. >> >> >>> A 'Catch-22' scenario that will probably only be solved with future >>> network bandwidth increase. >>> >> Not if what I propose if feasible or if we find a more video friendly >> transport. >> > > The only thing you can do is mock up some experiment and see if it works. > > I'd be the first to shout 'hooray' if there's something better than the > 2 alternatives we face now. > > > Regards, > Gerry > > > _______________________________________________ > X2go-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
Hello, We have some ideas about redirecting videos to client pc, but currently we have not enough resources to work in this direction. Regards, -- Oleksandr Shneyder Dipl. Informatik X2go Core Developer Team email: [email protected] web: www.obviously-nice.de --> X2go - everywhere@home
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
