On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 21:59 +0200, Milan Knížek wrote: > V Mon, 2 May 2011 02:15:38 -0700 > John Williams <[email protected]> napsáno: > > > Has anyone successfully run x2goserver(-one) with Gnome 3 ? > > > > I just upgraded my Archlinux system to Gnome 3, and x2goserver-one > > stopped working with Gnome. It gave a message about hardware not being > > suitable and it is reverting to gnome fallback. Unfortunately, it > > seems it was a one-time message, but I cannot get the message back, > > otherwise I would post the exact error message. What happens is that I > > end up with an x2go session with a plain desktop and a couple menus of > > apps, and that is all. > > > Gnome 3 requires a hw support from the video card. Before the upgrade, > have you successfully used some compositing window manager through x2go > (compiz, metacity with compositing enabled)? I doubt so... > > Up until now, I have not heard any news that Gnome 3 would provide a > fallback, which would be visually similar to the "normal" Gnome 3. > (Canonical has such a plan for its Unity - to be released in autumn > 2011.) > > This is by the way the reason, why I am in a search for a GNOME > replacement... <snip> Interesting. Sounds similar to our desire to stay with KDE3 rather than transition to KDE4 thus we've been using the Trinity desktop (http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net) - John
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
