Hi guys, On Fr 20 Mai 2011 18:53:51 CEST "John A. Sullivan III" wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 17:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:25:03 (CEST), Mike Gabriel wrote: > Currently, I see two possibilities (for X2go into Debian without > bringing up namespace issues), but I might be lacking sight here: > > 1. We make X2go work with NoMachine's NX 3.5 (complemented through a > patchset provided by X2go, this patchset may not break NX functionality > -> qtnx, freenx, etc., but improve functionality with X2go). I think this is the way to go > 2. We really fork NX libs, nxproxy (as already happened with > x2goagent). That would mean a renaming of libraries and also Git > projects etc, e.g.: x2goproxy, x2gocomp, x2gocompext, x2gocompshad. This is the option to stick the head in the sand. let's at least try Option #1.I agree - John
+1 by me, as well. Heinz? Alex? (I know, Heinz is offline at the weekend, so we may not expect an answer before Monday night...).
Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419 GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
pgpb4yVy0zF0y.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
