Hi Paul, On Do 30 Jun 2011 08:39:24 CEST Paul van der Vlis wrote:
I did take a closer look: The obfuscation addresses are delivered too. They say they are running anti-spam against it, but most mailservers are running anti-spam so I think it does not help. It can even give more identical spam because you have more e-mail addresses in this way. And I think people who prefer a secret mail address will use some Gmail or Yahoo address on mailinglists, and not the real address. So in my opinion it's better to use no obfuscation. Here is more information: http://gmane.org/tmda.php
Thanks for doing that. I will wait for the last edit requests I have sent to GMANE to take effect (rw access to x2go-dev, x2go-user) and after that, I will request non-obfuscation for all lists (if I do not here anything sceptical anymore).
Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419 GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
pgpBPjbrrvAAr.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
_______________________________________________ X2go-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
