On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:39 +0200, Moritz Struebe wrote: > On 2011-09-03 10:49, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > That would ultimately be hundreds to tens of thousands of CUPS > > processes running which would not have to be if they could be fed by a > > single CUPS server. That's why we originally hacked the x2goprint > > solution to support multiple x2goservers. > > 2.2MB in Memory on our system (/proc/<PID>/status - see "man proc"). > IMO there are far better ways of saving RAM - e.g. using a different > window manager may save a multitude of this. > <snip> But it's not just about RAM. There is CPU consumption. There is another unneeded service running which creates a possible security exposure. It means hundreds of systems to upgrade and manage instead of one. One is almost always easier, safer, and less expensive to manage than hundreds - at least in my management experience - John
_______________________________________________ X2go-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
