Am 21.02.2012 07:05, schrieb John A. Sullivan III: > Hello, all. I've been working on a project to implement traffic shaping > to conform to 95th percentile billing including our X2Go virtual > desktops. One of the challenges is prioritizing the interactive X2Go > traffic (screen, keyboard, mouse) differently from bulk traffic like > local share transfers, printing, and possibly sound. I thought this > would be trivial because of the SSH transport since SSH sets the > minimize-delay bit for interactive traffic and the maximize-throughput > bit for bulk transfers. Thus we could distinguish the packets by > looking at the TOS bits. This is how the default Linux pfifo_fast qdisc > does it anyway. > > I took a packet trace just to confirm it and, to my horror, I see that > we are not setting any of the TOS bits and thus not prioritizing > interactive traffic even with the default traffic shaping. > > I'm guessing this is a casualty of moving to libssh. Is there any way > to set the TOS bits for interactive to 0x10, bulk to 0x08 as it is in > OpenSSH?. It would be really nice if sound could be configured either > way according the the administrator's preference. Unfortunately, I did > not see anything in the libssh documentation to show how to do this > although I do not claim to understand it. > > This is a critical issue for any WAN based deployments like ours. > Thanks - John > > _______________________________________________ > X2Go-Dev mailing list > X2Go-Dev@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
Hello John, I think it is a question for libssh mailing list. regards, Alex -- Oleksandr Shneyder Dipl. Informatik X2go Core Developer Team email: oleksandr.shney...@obviously-nice.de web: www.obviously-nice.de --> X2go - everywhere@home
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ X2Go-Dev mailing list X2Go-Dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
