Hi Stefan,
On Thursday 05 April 2012 19:54:09 Stefan Baur wrote: > Am 05.04.2012 19:07, schrieb Helmer Teles: > > Hello ML. > > > > Any of you guys have any experience in shaping x2go traffic to separate > > file & printing sharing from normal session traffic? > > > > Any way to identify both print & file tunnels from the rest of the ssh > > stream? > > I'd say that depends on your usage scenario. If you're running VPN > connections or dedicated lines between several WAN sites (I'm assuming > there's no need for traffic shaping within a LAN), then nothing forces > you to use x2go's built-in file and print sharing. > > In my particular use case, printing is done by CUPS connecting directly > to ports 515 and 9100: > - 515 for LPD on *nix and Windows (yes, Windows has an LPD server as > well) and older network-attached printers, > - 9100 for TCP/IP-socket-printing on newer network-attached printers. > > Of course, if you're using x2go's SSH connection to avoid a full-blown > VPN, that's not going to help you. > > It *might* be possible to do throttling on the server side using some > iptables magic, but I've never tried that. > > -Stefan I'm trying to evaluate how the traffic flows between x2go and my laptop within a 3g connection, maybe i'm seeing it bad, but it seems that when connected to a rdp server inside a x2gosession both the traffic when watching a youtube video and transfering a 16MB file arrive at the same port, in my case both connection when watched with iftop are receiving all traffic at my port 33349 and being transmitted at :44126 server port. Is this normal ? I've watched both at the server and at my end. Thanks for your reply
_______________________________________________ X2Go-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
