Hi Mathias,

Sorry, for this late reply. Your mail somehow slipped through.

On  Do 26 Sep 2013 17:00:58 CEST, Mathias Ewald wrote:

for a company I was tasked with comparing x2go vs xrdp. Unfortunately,
information regarding performance is scarce at best ... What I have is
that x2go provides a lot more config options like pack, * redirection
etc. but absolutely nothing reliable on performance. Do you have any
information for me? Did you conduct any tests?

No, we did not conduct any bench mark or alike. There are many personal experiences around, though. Latency is more an issue to X2GO than bandwidth.

Furthermore, xrdp encapsulates the VNC protocol, so it is an XVnc session that gets ,,converted'' to RDP. (which then gets converted to X11 on the client, in case it's an Linux machine). So, this looks quite awkward. X2Go uses a compressed and cached X11-like (NX) protocol.

You may find some information on the NoMachine website [1]. X2Go's graphic stuff is based on NX 3.5.

Greets,
Mike


[1] http://www.nomachine.com




--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb

Attachment: binSjj7sx1V4n.bin
Description: Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel

Attachment: pgpB_SbcacPqs.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

_______________________________________________
X2Go-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev

Reply via email to