Hi Mirraz,

On  Mo 30 Sep 2013 16:03:44 CEST, Mirraz Mirraz wrote:

Пн. 30 сент. 2013 13:49:01 пользовате­ль Mike Gabriel ([email protected]) wrote:

are you willing to provide a patch? Otherwise, I will mark this      
reported issue as "won't fix" for now.

Mike

OK, I didn't plan to do it, but if you want...
Propose patch which fixes 3 evident bugs: 1 implicit function declaration and 2 array index out of bounds. I agree "[-Waddress]" warnings are not so terrible and may be that code helps to avoid future mistakes.
What about warnings in get.c: I don't know what to do.

thanks for that patched. As you might have noticed, I have applied the patch to nx-libs.git and it will be in 3.5.0.22.

However, do you consider this issue (#314) to be fixed? I have no spontaneous clue on the get.c issue, would have to sit down to find a solution.

Maybe someone else (Orion?) has an idea...

Greets,
Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb

Attachment: binCVKknEq167.bin
Description: Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel

Attachment: pgpnXXq2F3Zso.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

_______________________________________________
X2Go-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev

Reply via email to