On 16.02.2015 09:29 AM, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Mihai Moldovan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just as a heads-up: I would have moved this into the for loop condition
>> like so:
> The code might offer a lot of possibilities for improvement. However,
> as all this is derived from the original X11 code I would prefer
> leaving it as is (and fix it upstream). This will make it a lot easier
> to backport later patches and it will also make the nx transition to
> current X11 much easier.  Maybe add FIXME: comments to not forget
> those ideas.
>
> Uli

You're right. That's why I have only changed initialization where
conflicts are easily merged and the 1 MB thing.

Everything else was left in place. I'm just bringing it up so that
people don't follow (bad) examples.


Mihai

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
x2go-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-dev

Reply via email to