Op 13-08-11 16:29, Arnold Krille schreef: > On Saturday 13 August 2011 14:06:26 Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> Op 13-08-11 00:46, John A. Sullivan III schreef: >>> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 10:08 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have customers with x2go installations in a local network behind NAT >>>> (fat clients), and I am looking for a way how to connect easy to them. >>>> >>>> Of cause I can make a port forwarding, or an SSH tunnel from the fat >>>> client to my computer, but maybe you have a better and more flexible >>>> idea? >>>> >>>> In earlyer times I used TightVNC. There was the great "-via" command, >>>> something like: vncviewer -via [email protected] 192.168.0.33 >>>> >>>> Any ideas how to be flexible behind NAT with X2go? >>> >>> Hi, Paul. Let me make sure I understand. The server is on an internal >>> network behind NAT and users on the outside need to come in to it? >> >> No, it are very normal fat-clients behind NAT, and only I (the sysadmin) >> need connect to them, to help the people when there are problems. I am >> looking for an easy and flexible way to connect. >> >> ( Hmmm, IPv6 is an option here. But I have many other customers where >> the ISP does not offer IPv6. ) > > What about an openvpn with correct routing? In this case your clients router > is the server, your machine the client and the server pushes the routes for > the connected network. Works very well here both for us employees checking > into our business network on weekends/evenings and also to our clients. And > it > works with x2go, rdp, vnc, ssh, heck, we even have connected cups-printers > over this...
That's an idea for bigger networks. For smaller networks it's maybe too much work. Thanks! With regards, Paul. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl _______________________________________________ X2go-User mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-user
