Dear Orion, Aha! Now I see that there is also real EPEL build by you! No wonder I confused people with my explanation. Sorry about that. :-)
Should I drop the "EPEL" build and just use EPEL one, as the version seem to be roughly the same? -- Grigory Shamov HPC Analyst, Tech. Site Lead, Westgrid/Compute Canada E2-588 EITC Building, University of Manitoba (204) 474-9625 On 14-08-26 4:47 PM, "Orion Poplawski" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 08/26/2014 03:05 PM, Grigory Shamov wrote: >> Dear Les, >> >> Thank you for your always helpful answers. >> >> "Manual" means wget + rpm -i. Only x2go "EPEL" repo was enabled. There >>are >> two x2go repos, one "EPEL" and one "SUSE Open Factory" (you may want to >> visit the link I provided). So I call it "EPEL" to distinguish from the >> "SUSE Open Factory". >> >> There is also EPEL EPEL, a RedHat/Fedora project which has nothing to do >> with x2go besides providing the dependencies for "EPEL" build of it. I >>did >> not enable the EPEL repo. If dependencies in x2go rpms that are in >>"EPEL" >> build are correct, they should tell me, what rpms do I miss. Then I >> install missing ones manually. As described above. >> >> I have 4.0.1.15 that is in the "EPEL" x2go repo. >> > >Yeah, this is what I was afraid would happen with the use of EPEL >everywhere >on the X2Go site. > >Basically, follow the "using EPEL" link and just install from there. >I've >tried to tweak the wiki to make this clearer. > >-- >Orion Poplawski >Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 >NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 >3380 Mitchell Lane [email protected] >Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com _______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
