I understand that using a cloud server still involves some cpu sharing but I was interested in whether it would "help". I do know I can try the same using dedicated servers it will just cost a little more per hour but I can see about trying it next. On Apr 6, 2015 5:07 PM, "Robert Dinse" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That would certainly eliminate issues with hypervisor latency. > Unfortunately, I don't have the resources to do bare metal server testing > at this point, but client is bare metal. > > -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ > -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- > Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. > Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. > See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874 > . > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:57:23 +0000 >> From: Mike Gabriel <[email protected]> >> To: Robert Dinse <[email protected]> >> Cc: brian mullan <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Jerky Video Fixed >> >> Hi Brian, hi Robert, >> >> On Mo 06 Apr 2015 17:39:01 CEST, Robert Dinse wrote: >> >> I don't know enough about their cloud servers to know what else to look >>> at, you're giving your low latency kernel CPU cycles from a cloud, how >>> choppy >>> is the scheduling of CPU cycles to your kernel fro the cloud? Your >>> kernel >>> can't schedual CPU cycles during times it doesn't have them. >>> >>> >> I also think that testing with low latency should be from bare metal >> (server) to bare metal (client). >> >> Greets, >> Mike >> -- >> >> DAS-NETZWERKTEAM >> mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby >> fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 >> >> GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 >> mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de >> >> freeBusy: >> https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das- >> netzwerkteam.de.xfb >> >
_______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
