Am 06.10.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Walid MOGHRABI: >> I haven't tested it myself yet, but some devs suggested that slow >> session startup (as opposed to slow booting to login screen) may be >> caused by homedirs stored on NFS. >> Might be worth adding a test account that has a homedir "native" to the >> server, and if that brings a significant speed increase, trying out >> other networked filesystems like glusterfs. > Might be possible, NFS migh probably add a few latency but I wouldn't > recommend using GlusterFS instead, it is far slower due to the voulme beeing > mounted through Fuse. > I already did many testing on GlusterFS for our internal usage and it is by > far slower than NFS. > CephFS (file sharing "nfs like" filesystem provided by Ceph on top of it's > storage capabilities, as opposed to the "usual" block mode it provides) could > be worth trying but I didn't had the opportunity to do some testing by now. > Anyway, I think it should be at most comparable to NFS, not really faster.
See, you "think", but you haven't verified it in comparison to a local homedir. As I said, I haven't either, but it was a hint from some of the devs to look out for that. So maybe we just have to live with a slower session startup if networked homedirs are part of the equation; testers to confirm or dismiss this theory are welcome. ;-) Kind Regards, Stefan Baur -- BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364 Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list x2go-user@lists.x2go.org https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
