I might want to add that I do not think this setup (different verticle heights) would be that unusual. One monitor is my laptop and the other is a stand-alone monitor.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:17 PM, Blake McBride <[email protected]> wrote: > The setup has been working perfectly for me for years. However, one > monitor is higher than the other so I have a verticle offset set so that > the pointer moves cleanly horizontally without a vertical jump. Also, the > two monitors are not the same size. (as you've probably seen from the > report). > > Thank for looking into this!! > > --blake > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Ulrich Sibiller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Blake McBride <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Thanks!! >> > >> > $ xrandr >> > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 1847, maximum 8192 x 8192 >> > LVDS-1 connected 1920x1080+0+767 (normal left inverted right x axis y >> axis) >> > 360mm x 200mm >> > 1920x1080 59.9*+ 60.0 50.0 >> ... >> > VGA-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) >> > HDMI-1 connected 1920x1200+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y >> axis) >> > 518mm x 324mm >> > 1920x1200 60.0*+ >> >> So your left display is - for reasons I don't know - vertically >> shifted by 767 pixels. In other words: it does not start at the same y >> position as your second one but 767 pixels below. >> >> > $ xdpyinfo -ext XINERAMA> XINERAMA version 1.1 opcode: 141 >> > head #0: 1920x1080 @ 0,767 >> > head #1: 1920x1200 @ 1920,0 >> >> Xinerama is showing exactly the same as xrandr: a vertical shift of >> your left display by 767 pixels. So you need to find out why. Are you >> really using that setup without problems (apart from nx/x2go)? >> >> If that setup is intended by you then please report the output of the >> two commands from inside the session. >> >> Uli >> > >
_______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
